I found the article half insightful and half confusing. I felt like I was reading a political can’t-be-wrong horoscope. Democrats simultaneously need to triangulate and to be passionate and authentic? They hope to showcase a popular agenda, but they’ll be too far out on the political spectrum?

And the large story is that sure, Democrats may be a united caucus now, but the different approaches to the election by the various quoted parties will waste a lot of energy. The writer even called Dean a Righteous Loser (using more words).

In a polarized country, the Democrats need to fight for their principles. Fortunately, it seems to be news every time Democrats do this now. I don’t trust Emanuel to navigate around policy to electability; I would rather have Feingold and Dean any day.